Bokeh isn’t a word I use in my photography studies and practice.
But a question about it came up during my Introduction to Photography class, so I figured I’d write about it.
What Is Bokeh?
Yesterday, the term bokeh came up during the Introduction to Photography class.
I don’t use the term bokeh, so I didn’t have much to say about it other than I know what the word usually refers to, and
when I see it obviously appearing in a certain way, I may incorporate it into the composition or do my best to keep it out.
So I did a bit of research, and on top of
what I already knew, I learned some new stuff, too.
And based on my research and my way of thinking about photography, here’s what I can tell you.
The Etymology (Origin) of the Word
In Western photography, the term “bokeh” was first used in a 1977 issue of Photo Techniques magazine and is a derivative of a Japanese word meaning “hazy” or blurred.”
It describes the look of a photograph’s unfocused or unsharp areas, and there is no objective way to measure it.
So, whether bokeh is “good” or “bad” is subjective.
Compositionally, bokeh appears as parts of an image that are not in focus (unsharp) and separated from what we focus
on.
These unsharp areas are more than “simply the background,” as many of us think of it.
More experienced photographers understand the significance of the background as a practical and psychological consideration in the effectiveness of their photography, so they pay more attention to it than many
photographers.
How Does the Effect Happen?
Bokeh always happens, so It’s not something we need to pursue actively.
Bokeh is nothing more than unfocused light rays recorded in our pictures.
Furthermore, bokeh appears differently depending on aperture size;
distance focused on, and lens focal length.
Sometimes bokeh will contain unsharp shapes like circles or polygons.
And these shapes are caused by patterns of diffraction happening in the lens.
A wide lens opening will produce a more pronounced bokeh, while a smaller lends opening produces a less obvious bokeh.
Is Bokeh the Same As Depth of Field?
In short, no.
However, depth of field will make it more or less noticeable.
An Example of Bokeh
This is a picture I made with a 100mm-300mm 3.5-5.6 zoom
lens.
The focal length is 300mm, and the aperture was set at f5.6, the widest aperture available at that focal length.
The effect of bokeh is most noticeable in the lower right of the picture, with the bright white specular highlights of the reflecting water appearing as white circles.
If you click on the picture or use this link, you’ll be brought to a larger version of the image where you can scroll around the picture and magnify it.
https://wall-art.samdamico.com/shop-art/art_print_products/white-birch-tree-and-yellow-leaf-in-autumn?product_gallery=54420&product_id=1846310
Bokeh and Composition
We notice bokeh most when we use large aperture lenses with a shallow depth of field because a good chunk of the image may contain out-of-focus (unsharp) areas.
Lenses with longer (telephoto) or macro focal lengths, mainly when used with their widest lens openings, also make it stand out.
When we use smaller lens openings, out-of-focus areas appear sharper, so the effects of both are less noticeable.
What’s My Opinion of Bokeh?
It’s a word created in 1997 and used by hipsters more than seasoned and professional photographers.
Besides being aware of the background in my image when composing my picture, the term bokeh never enters my mind during my compositional process.
Also, when critiquing work, I never use the word.
Would I ever use the term when considering a lens to buy?
Nope.
So it’s not a word I find helpful in my photography studies and practice.
And while I’ve nothing against it, I don’t need to use a trendy word to describe a visual effect that’s been happening since photography started.
Classes are below.
